Archive for civil war

A Bullet For Sandoval – Julio Buchs – 1969

Posted in 60's with tags , , , , , , on January 5, 2013 by bookofdread

Image

Julio Buchs’ Los Desperados, (later re-titled A Bullet For Sandoval), is a weird fish. It starts with an incredible atmospheric scene at night of a man robbing the corpses of civil war fallen. The music and photography are tight and exciting. But as soon as the acting starts it drops into cornball mode and never lets me get into George Hilton’s character. The entire film suffers from this kind of schizophrenic duality between a gritty mood and tone versus a hokey funny one.

George Hilton plays Warner, a deserter who leaves his company to try and get to his wife before she has his child. After a daring escape Warner reaches his father-in-law’s estate only to find his wife dead. Ernest Borgnine, a pretty forgettable villain gives Warner his infant child and tells him to leave.

No one will help Warner and his child, because they have come from a village where cholera has taken hold, and everyone fears the sickness. The story is very cruel and pushes our man down a hole of devastation and loss from the very opening. It is interesting to see the villagers equate the presence of the war with the presence of the sickness, blaming the quantity of corpses for the pestilence.

As his personal tragedies mount, Warner is met by a series of misfits who team up with him and find his cause a sympathetic one. These characters are all fairly generic and half the time the scenes where these men are supposed to relate to each other it seems goofy and pulls me out of the movie a bit. Perhaps it is intentional relief due to the tragic nature of the story, or perhaps the actors doing the English dub for some of the performances simply couldn’t nail the nuance of the language and humor. Either way, it’s almost always a jarring tonal shift that keeps the film from being actually great.

The film ends in an interesting infiltration of Sandoval’s ranch home, which is somehow adjacent to a bullfighting arena! There is a pretty great knife fight between George Hilton and Ernest Borgnine, but the real cherry on top is the scene with the bull! The end of the picture is pretty hopeless but about 50% of the film is goofy anyway so it’s really hard to feel the tragedy of the situation.

The cinematography by Francisco Sempere is sometimes chilling and awesome, particularly the night scenes, but often in the daytime the film looses its magic and looks pretty plain. It’s the surreal colored lighting of the night photography that helps the picture find what is its coolest tone.

The score by Gianni Ferrio is actually quite excellent and probably saves the film from being a bit more generic. Quentin Tarantino used Ferrio’s One Silver Dollar, (UN Dolaro Bucato), in Inglorious Basterds. The music in A Bullet For Sandoval is both tragic and exciting and the themes get stuck in your head.

Overall, the film was good, not great. I would recommend this film only to lovers of the Spaghetti Western genre, lovers of cholera, and US Civil War Enthusiasts.

Advertisements

Lincoln – Steven Spielberg – 2012

Posted in 2010's with tags , , , , , , , on November 24, 2012 by bookofdread

Image

 

Steven Spielberg’s Lincoln is rarely moving and I would categorize it as one of the most understated and restrained works of his career. He does not go for dazzle or spectacle here, despite two scenes of carnage, for the most part he sticks to the academic. The film is mostly about the passage of the 13th amendment and how Lincoln delayed the end of the Civil War so that he could end slavery.

So how is it?

Most of the time it was very dry. The sets looked musty and dark and the actors were often clouded in shadow. I understand the slavishness to the available light at the time, but sometimes the picture was dull to view. The images aren’t terribly dynamic.

The opening scene, where the soldiers repeat back the Gettysburg address was silly and absurd. Dane Dehaan is cool, but this bit had me rolling my eyes right away.

Daniel Day Lewis is fine and good as Lincoln, and gives him a respected air of authoritarian paternity. However, by the pictures end, Lincoln was as much an enigma to me as he was before I saw the film. Spielberg never gets us very close to the man, and perhaps that is why he was such a successful diplomat, because no one could ever guess his heart.

Sally Field is also only fine and good. The way the film deals with her madness is actually quite perfect and were Field not acting so sane, I might have really enjoyed this aspect of the film, but her performance might be called subtle, but I wish they had taken her just a bit more to the extreme.

JGL as the junior Lincoln is forgettable as is the father’s relationship with his youngest son. These scenes are in the story to humanize the president, but one gets the impression that Lincoln had very little time for his sons and they were not a priority, at least during this session of congress. I did really like the scene where JGL sees all the severed limbs dumped in a pit though.

The supporting cast of the film is fun and funny in a 10th grade history class sort of way. David Strathairn and James Spader had me chuckling from time to time, but this is really Tommy Lee Jones film. His Thaddeus Stevens is a remarkable character and Jones’ granite features perfectly embody Stevens’ radical and gruff demeanor. This character is funny in nearly every scene of the picture and when you give the best performance in a film starring Daniel Day Lewis that’s really saying something.

The dialogue is beautiful if very dry and the atmosphere is quite transporting, but Lincoln never quite moved me. I was waiting for a moment of heroism or some type of narrative catharsis, but the point of the film is that democracy is a slow, backhanded process that can sometimes yield positive results. But in order to really feel that, you have to look at all the backroom handshaking and blackmailing and pleading that it feels like a miracle that it works at all.

The film goes on about twenty minutes too long. We could have ended there with Stevens in bed, but oh no, we have to go all the way to Lincoln’s death, and even then it is an absolute cop out to not stage that scene given the opportunity to put us there in the theater. Like I said, I’d have been satisfied with an ending earlier, but if you are going to go there at least do it with some respect. That could have been a terrifying, tragic, heart-breaking moment, but nope, it’s glossed over with a crap scene, and one shot of the man on a bloody pillow.

If this film were about lionizing Lincoln or the democratic process, I’d say it mostly succeeds. Lincoln is destined to be shown in government classes across the country. I’m just not sure it’s engaging enough to keep a teenager from falling asleep at his desk.

%d bloggers like this: